Legal Dispute Between SPRIBE and Aviator Studio Shifts in Brazil

July 8, 2026
News
...

Background of the Trademark Dispute

The ongoing trademark conflict between SPRIBE and Aviator Studio has taken a significant turn in Brazil. Recently, a Brazilian court decided to lift a temporary injunction that had previously been granted to Spribe OÜ. The dispute revolves around the use of the “Aviator” name within the Brazilian market. This development follows an earlier decision by a federal court that halted Spribe’s ability to utilize its registered trademark in Brazil while the wider legal battle continues.

Impact of the Court of Justice of Pernambuco’s Decision

The Court of Justice of Pernambuco concluded that maintaining the earlier injunction was no longer justified. Judge Andrea Epaminondas Tenorio de Brito explained that the initial decision rested on the assumption that Spribe’s trademark rights in Brazil were still valid and enforceable. However, this stance was overturned by a ruling from the 18th Federal Civil Court of the Federal District which altered the legal landscape substantially.

This June ruling suspended Spribe’s exclusive rights over the Aviator brand temporarily, pending the outcome of the broader trademark lawsuit. Both companies remain embroiled in a lengthy legal confrontation, with Aviator Studio asserting that their claim to the brand predates Spribe’s. Brazil has emerged as a prominent arena in this trademark conflict.

With the temporary suspension of Spribe’s trademark rights, enforcing their claims to the Aviator name in Brazil will become more difficult. Aviator Studio has accused Spribe of applying undue pressure on operators to stop using the Aviator brand, a tactic that now faces less uncertainty with the injunction lifted.

Ongoing Legal Proceedings and International Context

Despite the recent ruling in Brazil, the trademark dispute continues both there and in other countries. Brazilian federal courts referenced decisions from Georgia favoring Aviator Studio, which influenced their judgment regarding Spribe’s rights. Nevertheless, the final decision remains uncertain and could still favor either party.

In the United Kingdom, the courts have taken a different stance, denying Aviator Studio’s request to expedite the case concerning brand ownership. The UK court highlighted the need for careful legal analysis due to the potential wide-ranging effects of any ruling across multiple international jurisdictions.

In summary, revoking Spribe’s injunction is a procedural update rather than a decisive shift in the ongoing conflict with Aviator Studio. With litigation progressing in various countries, a resolution is not expected soon. Meanwhile, in Brazil, the Aviator trademark restrictions are likely to ease, offering more freedom for operators using the brand.