Virginia Lawmakers Progress Fairfax Casino Proposal Amid New Conditions
Overview of the Fairfax Casino Proposal
Efforts to bring a casino to Northern Virginia continue to move forward, despite the introduction of new conditions that may delay the project and increase its costs. Recently, the Virginia House General Laws Committee voted 12–7 to send Senate Bill 756 to the Appropriations Committee. This legislation aims to allow Fairfax County to host casino gaming, marking a pivotal step toward adding a large-scale resort in the state.
Major Changes to the Legislation
If passed, Senate Bill 756 would grant the Fairfax County Board of Supervisors the authority to solicit bids for developing a casino featuring slot machines, table games, and retail sports wagering. Currently, Virginia law restricts casinos to cities such as Bristol, Danville, Norfolk, Petersburg, and Portsmouth. However, the bill has undergone several substantial amendments that significantly distinguish it from its original Senate draft.
Among the most impactful changes is an increase in the licensing fee for casinos, which has risen from $15 million to $150 million. Half of this increased fee would be returned to the locality through the Virginia Lottery. The bill also introduces requirements for developers to invest in local community development and uphold strong labor standards.
Additionally, a new referendum clause has been added, requiring not only countywide voter approval but also majority support from residents within the specific district where the casino is proposed. Should either vote fail, Fairfax County would be prohibited from holding another casino referendum for a three-year period.
Community Response and Economic Considerations
Proponents of the bill believe that these added safeguards create a fair compromise between fostering economic growth and maintaining local control. They highlight a 40% tax on adjusted casino revenue, with half of that tax revenue designated to benefit the community. Funds would be allocated to address gambling-related issues, improve public transit, and support school construction projects.
Nevertheless, opposition remains significant. A 2025 poll surveying 500 Fairfax County residents revealed that 64% opposed the casino plan. Many respondents expressed concerns about increased traffic congestion in busy commercial areas and potential negative impacts on nearby small businesses.
Despite these reservations, supporters argue that a resort-style casino could help mitigate declining commercial property tax revenue, create new jobs, and stimulate the local economy through tourism. The bill includes a sunset clause: if residents do not approve a referendum by July 1, 2029, the legislation will expire. While opposition is strong, the possibility of a casino in Fairfax remains open as discussions continue over the coming years.
