South Carolina Casino Legalization Faces Renewed Opposition

Resistance from Religious Groups Against Casino Expansion

Efforts to introduce commercial casino gambling in South Carolina are encountering renewed opposition, particularly from religious organizations. As the state legislature debates loosening longstanding gambling restrictions to capitalize on potential tax revenues, religious leaders are actively lobbying to maintain existing prohibitions.

Concerns Over Gambling’s Social Impact

A coalition of pastors and faith-based groups recently convened at the State House in Columbia for “Pastor’s Day at the Capitol.” This gathering included both public statements and private meetings with lawmakers, highlighting a coordinated effort to prevent the expansion of casinos within the state.

Opponents argue that allowing casinos could exacerbate financial struggles by increasing gambling addiction and family debt. They also warn that social problems might intensify, especially in rural communities where casino projects are often pitched with promises of economic revitalization.

This resistance is timed with legislative developments. State Representative Bruce Bannister, chair of the House Ways and Means Committee, is preparing a comprehensive gambling reform bill that would create the South Carolina Gambling Commission—an entity responsible for issuing casino licenses, which would mark a significant step toward legalizing expanded gambling.

Potential Economic Benefits of Legalized Casinos

Proponents of casino legalization point to research indicating that a casino resort located along the Interstate 95 corridor could contribute around $100 million annually in tax revenue. Advocates argue this could stimulate local economies, especially in counties near the proposed developments.

Developers, including Santee Development Corp., highlight the potential for job creation and increased investments in areas facing economic challenges. Representative Bannister acknowledges the difficulties ahead, noting that while opposition is vocal, it represents a minority viewpoint. His proposal also earmarks 35% of casino tax proceeds for the South Carolina Conservation Bank as a potential benefit of legalization.

Political Challenges and Continued Resistance

Beyond religious groups, resistance also comes from key political figures. Governor Henry McMaster remains strongly opposed to casinos and sports betting, cautioning that expanding gambling could harm the state’s cultural integrity. Even if the legislature passes the gambling legalization bill, the governor’s veto poses a significant obstacle.