Minnesota Supreme Court Upholds Dealer-Assist Table Games at Running Aces Racino
Background on the Legal Dispute
The Minnesota Supreme Court recently confirmed a previous ruling that permits the Running Aces Casino Hotel Racetrack to operate dealer-assisted table games despite objections from a local tribal community. This decision concludes a legal challenge regarding the classification of these games under Minnesota’s gambling laws.
Concerns Raised by the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community
Three years ago, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community filed a lawsuit against Running Aces, arguing that the dealer-assisted table games infringed upon the tribe’s exclusive rights to electronic gaming within the state. These particular games feature a hybrid format where players participate through electronic terminals arranged like stadium seating, while live dealers handle cards and dice.
This setup offers advantages such as automated payouts, increased player privacy, and accessibility for those new to table games who may feel intimidated in traditional settings. Nevertheless, the tribal community contended that the use of electronic components effectively constituted illegal electronic gambling.
Court Rulings and Final Outcome
A lower Court of Appeals sided with Running Aces, determining that the dealer-assisted games do not meet the legal definition of electronic gambling. Unhappy with this outcome, the tribe escalated the matter to the Minnesota Supreme Court for further review.
The Supreme Court was evenly split on the issue, with three justices supporting the previous ruling and three dissenting. One justice abstained due to prior involvement in the appellate decision. This deadlock meant the Supreme Court did not issue a new opinion, effectively leaving the lower court’s ruling intact.
Reactions and Implications
Running Aces praised the decision, highlighting the importance of the dealer-assisted format in providing a comfortable, less socially pressured environment for players who want to enjoy table games. Conversely, the Shakopee Mdewakanton Sioux Community expressed disappointment, maintaining their stance that the racino’s offerings violate their exclusive tribal gaming rights.
