Bipartisan Efforts to Reinstate Full Gambling Loss Deductions Gain Momentum
Background on the Gambling Loss Deduction Controversy
In the United States, recent changes to the tax code have significantly altered how gambling losses are deducted. Previously, gamblers could fully deduct losses against their winnings, but a new provision limits the deductible losses to 90% of gambling wins. This shift means that individuals who break even on their gambling activities may still face tax liabilities, a change that has sparked widespread concern within the gambling community and among lawmakers.
Bipartisan Legislative Response
The controversial limitation was introduced as part of legislation under President Donald Trump’s administration, drastically deviating from long-established tax practices. Recognizing the potential harm of this amendment, lawmakers from both major parties have united to challenge it. Representatives Steven Horsford from Nevada and Max Miller from Ohio have proposed bill HR 6985 with the goal of restoring the full deductibility of gambling losses, effective retroactively from the 2026 tax year.
“Americans should not be taxed on money they didn’t actually take home. By restoring the full deduction for gambling losses, this bill ensures honesty and consistency.”
Ohio Representative Max Miller
Additional bipartisan efforts include the FAIR Bet Act, championed by Nevada Representative Dina Titus. Although this bill has struggled to advance to the House floor, it has garnered robust support from industry groups and advocates committed to protecting gambling interests.
Industry Support and Concerns
The gambling industry strongly supports reverting to the previous deduction rules, arguing it represents a matter of fairness. They contend that unlike gambling, other risk-driven financial activities like stock or commodity trading do not face such restrictive tax treatments. Particularly in states dependent on tourism, such as Nevada, casino operators emphasize that the current limitation could push sophisticated gamblers toward unregulated black market options, which pose risks to both consumer protection and state revenue.
Moreover, online sportsbooks and poker sites caution that this tax modification complicates accounting procedures and imposes undue burdens on casual gamblers. They argue that limiting loss deductions could discourage participation in regulated markets, potentially reducing overall industry growth and consumer protection.
“Taxing people on money they never actually earned is fundamentally unfair and harmful to Nevada’s economy.”
Nevada Representative Steven Horsford
Opposition and Challenges Ahead
Despite increasing bipartisan pressure, some opposition persists. Critics view the tax change as a minor technical adjustment rather than a significant policy shift. Fiscal conservatives highlight concerns about the potential negative impacts on government revenue if the deduction limits are removed. In the Senate, leaders on key financial committees have so far shown reluctance to re-examine the issue, and recent attempts to revisit the deduction cap have failed to gain traction or receive committee hearings.
