Adin Ross Banned and Reinstated on Kick Amid $50M Rainbet Deal Rumors

Adin Ross Faces Temporary Ban on Kick Platform

Adin Ross recently experienced a sudden ban from Kick, a streaming platform that rose to prominence as an alternative to Twitch’s strict gambling restrictions. Kick had distinguished itself by allowing streamers greater freedom over their content while leaving viewers in charge of their viewing choices.

Ban Linked to Rainbet Partnership Rumors

The exact reason for Adin Ross’s ban remains unconfirmed. However, the incident coincided with news of his new partnership with Rainbet, a gambling platform rivaling Stake. Reports suggest Ross agreed to a substantial $50 million annual streaming deal with Rainbet.

Quick Reversal of Ban Without Official Explanation

Many speculated that Kick’s ban was a response influenced by Stake’s involvement in Kick’s backing. Despite this, the ban was shortly lifted, and Adin Ross regained access to his account without any public explanation from Kick.

There are unverified reports claiming Ross received $100 million upfront from Rainbet as part of this exclusive streaming agreement. The details surfaced after streamer Cuffem inadvertently revealed the partnership news online. Ross explained that his decision to switch platforms was motivated by a desire to spend more time with his friends and provide them opportunities to earn income.

Rainbet Challenges Stake for Streaming Talent

The gambling community has taken notice of Rainbet emerging as a serious competitor to Stake for attracting high-profile streamers. Adin Ross’s move has sparked conversations among other popular streamers on Kick, including Trainwreck, who is affiliated with Stake.

When asked about switching to Rainbet amid rumors of a $200 million deal, Trainwreck dismissed the idea, stating that Rainbet lacks the capacity to pay out the large winnings he often secures.

Speculation Over Shared Ownership Sparks Marketing Theories

Some viewers and commentators have wondered whether Rainbet and Stake might be owned by the same group. If true, the heated exchange surrounding Adin Ross’s ban and platform switch could be interpreted as a clever marketing tactic to generate buzz and engagement within the streaming and gambling communities.