Subway to roll out $3 6-inch subs

subway_20100325151444_JPG

Getty Images

advertisement

Posted: 02/28/2013

NEW YORK - If Subway's $5 Footlong is too expensive, the chain is now offering a $3 6-inch sub.

The promotion makes Subway just the latest chain to step up its value offerings as the competition for price-conscious diners intensifies.

With the broader restaurant industry expected to be flat to modestly up this year, companies are going to greater lengths to convince people to eat out more.

Burger King this week introduced "King Deals" in select markets, which includes a daily featured entree, small drink and side for $4.99. Wendy's recently revamped its value menu and McDonald's has been playing up its Dollar Menu.

Subway says the $3 deal will be for a rotation of select sandwiches.

The promotion kicks off in March with the Oven Roasted Chicken sandwich and runs through June.
 

Copyright 2013 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.

  • Comments
Advertisement

Consumer News


  1. Put to the test: Ground meat labels

    Put to the test: Ground meat labels

    As you prepare for your Memorial Day cookout, we put ground meat to the test to see if the labels are accurate.

  2. Will insurance go up after tornadoes?

    Will insurance go up after tornadoes?

    Would you be covered if a storm or other damage hit your home? The simple steps you can take to protect your home.

    • CLE will soon add more red-light cameras

    • App stores all your loyalty cards

      • Swimming pool on hold for bad concrete

        • Why are gas prices so high in NE Ohio?

        • Gas prices take big jump in Ohio

          • Stay Connected

          Send us a News Tip Send us a News Tip
          Mobile & iPhone/Android Apps Mobile & iPhone/Android Apps
          Twitter Twitter
          Facebook Facebook
          YouTube YouTube
          Community Calendar Community Calendar
          RSS Feeds RSS Feeds
          ClevelandLaw.tv ClevelandLaw.tv